Voters in conservative Kansas resoundingly affirm support for access to abortion

Kansas voters on Tuesday sent a resounding message about their desire to protect abortion rights, rejecting a ballot measure in a conservative state with deep ties to the anti-abortion movement that would have allowed the Republican-controlled legislature to tighten restrictions or ban the procedure outright .

It was the first test of voter sentiment after the US Supreme Court’s decision in June that overturned the constitutional right to abortion, providing an unexpected result with potential implications for the coming midterm elections.

WATCH | Biden signs executive order protecting travel between states for abortion:

Biden signs executive order protecting travel between states for abortion

US President Joe Biden signed the executive order aimed in part at making it easier for those seeking abortions to travel between states. It’s the second executive order Biden has signed regarding abortion rights in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in June that overturned Roe v. Wade.

While it was just one state, it was a major victory for abortion rights advocates and also provided some hope for Democrats looking to mobilize voters for the November midterm elections.

“This vote makes clear what we know: the majority of Americans agree that women should have access to abortion and should have the right to make their own health-care decisions,” President Joe Biden said in a statement.

After calling on Congress to “restore the protections of Roe” in federal law, Biden added, “And, the American people must continue to use their voices to protect the right to women’s health care, including abortion.”

Biden on Wednesday signed an executive order aimed in part at making it easier for women seeking abortions to travel between states to obtain access to the procedure. He said it builds on the executive order he signed last month that created a federal task force on reproductive care.

More specifically, one of the directives under the order will allow states that have not outlawed abortion to apply for specific Medicaid waivers that would, in effect, help them treat women who have traveled from out of state.

LISTEN | Uncertainty amid new US abortion restrictions:

The Current23:08US abortion restrictions creating uncertainty around miscarriage care

US restrictions on abortion are leading to medical dilemmas around miscarriages, as physicians and patients weigh up the risk of criminal penalties against the risks of curbing care. We talk to high-risk ob-gyn Dr. Erika Werner; and law professor Kimberly Mutcherson.

Strong anti-abortion support historically

The vote provided a warning to Republicans who had celebrated the Supreme Court ruling and were moving swiftly with abortion bans or near-bans in nearly half the states.

Anti-abortion “Summer of Mercy” protests in 1991 inspired abortion opponents to take over the Kansas Republican Party and make the legislature more conservative. As well, Kansas abortion provider Dr. George Tiller was murdered in Wichita in 2009 by an anti-abortion extremist.

“Kansans bluntly rejected anti-abortion politicians’ attempts at creating a reproductive police state,” said Kimberly Inez McGuire, executive director of Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity. “Today’s vote was a powerful rebuke and a promise of the mounting resistance.”

People standing around a table in a hotel conference room rejoice.
Abortion-rights supporters in Topeka, Kan., React to early results in a vote that showed voters rejecting a state constitutional amendment that would have declared there is no right to abortion in Kansas. (Evert Nelson / USA Today Network / Reuters)

The proposed amendment to the Kansas constitution would have added language stating that it does not grant the right to abortion. A 2019 state Supreme Court decision declared that access to abortion is a “fundamental” right under the state’s Bill of Rights, preventing a ban and potentially thwarting legislative efforts to enact new restrictions.

The referendum was closely watched as a barometer of liberal and moderate voters’ anger over the Supreme Court’s ruling scrapping the nationwide right to abortion. In Kansas, abortion opponents wouldn’t say what legislation they’d pursue if the amendment were passed and bristled when opponents predicted it would lead to a ban.

Mallory Carroll, a spokesperson for the national anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, described the vote as “a huge disappointment” for the movement. She added that after the US Supreme Court ruling, “We must work exponentially harder to achieve and maintain protections for unborn children and their mothers.”

‘I want her to have the same rights’

The electorate in Tuesday’s vote wasn’t typical for a Kansas primary, particularly because tens of thousands of unaffiliated voters cast ballots.

Kristy Winter, 52, a Kansas City-area teacher and unaffiliated voter, voted against the measure and brought her 16-year-old daughter with her to her polling place.

“I want her to have the same right to do what she feels is necessary, mostly in the case of rape or incest,” she said. “I want her to have the same rights my mother has had most of her life di lei.”

Opponents of the measure predicted that the anti-abortion groups and lawmakers behind the measure would push quickly for an abortion ban if voters approved it. Before the vote, the measure’s supporters refused to say whether they would pursue a ban.

The 2019 Kansas Supreme Court decision protecting abortion rights blocked a law that banned the most common second-trimester procedure, and another law imposing special health regulations on abortion providers also is on hold.

The vote is the start of what could be a long-running series of legal battles playing out where lawmakers at the state level are more conservative on abortion than citizens, governors or the courts.

Kentucky will vote in November on whether to add language similar to Kansas’ proposed amendment to its state constitution, while Vermont will decide in November whether to add an abortion rights provision to its constitution.

As well, the US Justice Department sued Idaho on Tuesday over its statute that criminalizes abortions, subjecting anyone who performs or attempts to perform an abortion to a felony punishable by between two and five years in prison.

Attorney General Merrick Garland argued that it violates federal law requiring doctors to provide pregnant women medically necessary treatment that could include abortion.

LISTEN | Abortion rights in Canada:

Front Burner29:47How safe are abortion rights in Canada?

The recent decision by the US Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade, which had secured constitutional protections for abortion in the country for nearly 50 years, raises questions about whether something similar could happen here. Canada has its own historic Supreme Court ruling that protects abortion rights: R. vs. Morgentaler. It still stands. But is it ironclad? Or could it be overturned, too? Today on Front Burner, we explore the history of abortion rights in Canada, just how protected they really are, and how much sway the anti-abortion movement has here. We talk to Kelly Gordon, an assistant professor at McGill University and co-author of the book, The Changing Voice of the Anti-Abortion Movement: The Rise of Pro-Woman Rhetoric in Canada and the United States.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *