Li, H., Helling, R., Tang, C. & Wingreen, N. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science 273666–669 (1996).
England, JL & Shakhnovich, EI Structural determinant of protein designability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90218101 (2003).
Hoang, TX, Trovato, A., Seno, F., Banavar, JR & Maritan, A. Geometry and symmetry presculpt the free-energy landscape of proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1017960–7964 (2004).
Rose, GD, Fleming, PJ, Banavar, JR & Maritan, A. A backbone-based theory of protein folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 10316623–16633 (2006).
Skolnick, J. & Gao, M. The role of local versus nonlocal physicochemical restraints in determining protein native structure. Curr. Open. Struct. Biol. 681–8 (2021).
Kuhlman, B. et al. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 3021364–1368 (2003).
Jiang, L. et al. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 3191387–1391 (2008).
Koga, N. et al. Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 491222–227 (2012).
Marcos, E. et al. Principles for designing proteins with cavities formed by curved β sheets. Science 355201–206 (2017).
Dou, J. et al. De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel. Nature 561485–491 (2018).
Lu, P. et al. Accurate computational design of multipass transmembrane proteins. Science 3591042–1046 (2018).
Glasgow, AA et al. Computational design of a modular protein sense–response system. Science 3661024–1028 (2019).
Huang, PS, Boyken, SE & Baker, D. The coming of age of de novo protein design. Nature 537320–327 (2016).
Alford, R. F. et al. The Rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 133031–3048 (2017).
Grigoryan, G. & DeGrado, WF Probing designability via a generalized model of helical bundle geometry. J. Mol. Biol. 4051079–1100 (2011).
Thomson, AR et al. Computational design of water-soluble α-helical barrels. Science 346485–488 (2014).
Brunette, TJ et al. Exploring the repeat protein universe through computational protein design. Nature 528580–584 (2015).
Jacobs, T. et al. Design of structurally distinct proteins using strategies inspired by evolution. Science 352687–690 (2016).
Pan, X. et al. Expanding the space of protein geometries by computational design of de novo fold families. Science 3691132–1136 (2020).
Baker, D. An exciting but challenging road ahead for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci. 191817–1819 (2010).
Otten, R. et al. How directed evolution reshapes the energy landscape in an enzyme to boost catalysis. Science 3701442–1446 (2020).
Zhang, Y., Hubner, IA, Arakaki, AK, Shakhnovich, E. & Skolnick, J. On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1032605–2610 (2006).
Kukic, P. et al. Mapping the protein fold universe using the CamTube force field in molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11e1004435 (2015).
MacDonald, JT, Maksimiak, K., Sadowski, MI & Taylor, WR De novo backbone scaffolds for protein design. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 781311–1325 (2010).
MacDonald, JT et al. Synthetic β-solenoid proteins with the fragment-free computational design of a β-hairpin extension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 11310346–10351 (2016).
Van Gunsteren, WF, Berendsen, HJC & Rullmann, JAC Stochastic dynamics for molecules with constraints: Brownian dynamics of n-alkanes. Mol. Phys. 4469–95 (1981).
Xiong, P. et al. Protein design with a comprehensive statistical energy function and boosted by experimental selection for foldability. Nat. Commun. 55330 (2014).
Xiong, P. et al. Increasing the efficiency and accuracy of the ABACUS protein sequence design method. Bioinformatics 36136–144 (2020).
Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98146401 (2007).
Wang, G. & Dunbrack, RL, Jr. PISCES: recent improvements to a PDB sequence culling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 33W94–W98 (2005).
Berman, HM et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28235–242 (2000).
Taylor, WR A ‘pperiodic table’ for protein structures. Nature 416657–662 (2002).
Baker, D. What has de novo protein design taught us about protein folding and biophysics? Protein Sci. 28678–683 (2019).
Liu, R., Wang, J., Xiong, P., Chen, Q. & Liu, H. De novo sequence redesign of a functional Ras-binding domain globally inverted the surface charge distribution and led to extreme thermostability. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1182031–2042 (2021).